Exceptions To Confidentiality In Arbitration
Wilson v Emmott (March 2008) concerned an
appeal against an order for disclosure in court proceedings in
NSW and BVI of documents generated in an English arbitration
involving the same parties.
The Court of Appeal refused the appeal concluding that,
while the conduct of arbitrations is private, that did not mean
that arbitrations remain private for all purposes. Despite
there being allegations of a commercially sensitive nature,
disclosure was required in the interests of justice (which were
not limited to the interests of justice in England) that
foreign courts would not be potentially misled, particularly
where the cases being pursued in the foreign courts raised the
same or similar allegations.
Summarising the current authorities in the area, the Court
identified four cases in which disclosure would be permissible:
(i) where there is consent, implied or express; (ii) with leave
or by order of the court; (iii) where it is reasonably
necessary for the protection of the legitimate interests of an
arbitrating party; and (iv) where the interests of justice
and/or the public interest requires it.
In this context, there are three broad points of principle.
Firstly, the existence of an arbitration
dispute has never, in practice, been confidential. Secondly,
save for the exceptions in Emmott, the
parties' cases in an arbitration are
subject to confidentiality unless a party applies to the court
(at which point there is a risk that confidentiality will be
compromised with publication of the judgment). Thirdly, save in
rare cases where allegations of perjury arise, the
evidence in an arbitration will almost always
be protected by confidentiality.
The primary motivation in choosing to arbitrate should not
be the desire to maintain confidentiality. In fact,
particularly with shipping and commodity arbitrations, it is
often the desire for a specific expertise or for informality of
procedure which informs a party's decision to
arbitrate.
While concerns may be raised for England's reputation as
an arbitration seat if it is thought...
To continue reading
Request your trial