Global M & A: Know the differences btw PRC & foreign law contracts

Citationjd0114
AuthorJackie(Jiahe) Yu,Yong Kaichang
Date08 August 2018
Published date08 August 2018
Subject MatterComerical Law
2020/11/10 Global M&A: Know the differences btw PRC & foreign law contracts | China Law Insight
https://www.chinalawinsight.com/2018/08/articles/pe/global-ma-know-the-differences-btw-prc-foreign-law-contracts/ 1/7
CHINA LAW INSIGHT
Global M&A: Know the differences btw PRC &
foreign law contracts
By King & Wood Mallesons on August 8, 2018
by Yong Kaichang Jackie(Jiahe) Yu King & Wood Mallesons International Partner
of Securities Group
In cross border transactions, there is sometimes a misconception amongst both
PRC and foreign parties that all contracts are by and large the same, whether
governed by PRC law or foreign law, and that the key to a good contract is just
proper drafting. Whilst it is true that the key to a good contract is good drafting
backed by proper experience and expertise, different legal systems have inherent
conceptual differences and as such, there are fundamental differences between
PRC law-governed contracts and foreign law-governed contracts. These differences
affect the interpretation, construction and adjudication of a contract – and will
impact parties’ rights, obligations, remedies and liabilities under it. In this article,
we briefly compare some key general differences between PRC law-governed
contracts and common law-governed contracts.
Consideration
Common law requires that consideration must be given in return for a promise to
form a binding contract (with a notable exception of a deed). In contrast, under
PRC law, a contract is formed at the time when a promisor’s promise becomes
effective . This means that, a promise for which no consideration has been given,

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT