Group Litigation - Bates V Post Office

Case Alert - [2017] EWHC 2844 (QB)

Judge rules that hearing should not be fixed to take account of counsel's availability in group litigation

When the date for the first CMC in this group litigation case was ordered, the clerks to leading counsel for the claimants advised that they could not attend on that date. Fraser J told the parties that a formal application to move the date would be required but this was not done and the judge refused to change the date for the CMC in this large and complicated case. At the CMC, a substantive hearing was ordered for November 2018. This time, leading counsel for the defendant was unable to make that date because of a prior commitment in the Chancery Division around the same time. Both parties requested the November date be moved into 2019.

That application has now been refused by Fraser J. He said that "Fixing hearings in this group litigation around the diaries of busy counsel, rather than their fixing their...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT