ICLG Lending & Secured Finance 2018: Guide to Australian, Hong Kong and PRC law (Australia)

Citationjd0011
Published date03 May 2018
Date03 May 2018
Subject MatterBanking & Finance
WWW.ICLG.COM
156 ICLG TO: LENDING & SECURED FINANCE 2018
© Published and reproduced with kind permission by Global Legal Group Ltd, London
Chapter 28
King & Wood Mallesons
Yuen-Yee Cho
Elizabeth Hundt Russell
Australia
2 Guarantees
2.1 Can a company guarantee borrowings of one or more
other members of its corporate group (see below for
questionsrelatingtofraudulenttransfer/nancial
assistance)?
Yes. However, corporate benet and other requirements need to be
considered. These issues are outlined below.
2.2 Are there enforceability or other concerns (such as
director liability) if only a disproportionately small (or
no)benettotheguaranteeing/securingcompanycan
be shown?
The directors of a company owe a duty to the company to act for
the benet of the company in its best interests, with due care and
diligence, in good faith and for a proper purpose. Directors must
also avoid any conict between a director’s duty to the company and
that director’s personal interest. Directors must comply with these
duties when resolving to give a guarantee.
In determining whether to grant a guarantee or provide security,
directors may consider both direct benets and indirect benets of
doing so. Indirect benets may include that the provision of the
guarantee is a requirement for the ongoing support of other members
of the corporate group where the support also indirectly benets the
company. While it is not sufcient that the guarantee benets the
corporate group as a whole, a director of a wholly owned subsidiary
may take into account the best interests of its holding company as
long as the constitution of the company permits it to do so and the
company is solvent at all relevant times.
A guarantee that does not commercially benet a company may
be voidable or, in a liquidation, the guarantee could be deemed an
uncommercial transaction or unfair preference. A breach of duties
by directors can result in civil and criminal penalties and personal
liability for directors.
2.3 Is lack of corporate power an issue?
An Australian company has all the powers of an individual. This
includes the power to give a guarantee. However those powers may
be limited by the company’s constitution.
1 Overview
1.1 Whatarethemaintrends/signicantdevelopmentsin
the lending markets in your jurisdiction?
2017 was a good year for borrowers – with bank funding costs down
and a scarcity of assets/names driving better pricing and terms for the
borrowers who came to market, together with the emergence of many
alternative sources of funding on competitive terms. These include
a strong demand from the Australian debt capital markets (medium
term notes) and US private placement markets for infrastructure
borrowers. Strong corporates such as Sydney Airport, AMP Group
and Ramsay continued to tap the syndicated loan markets.
On the more highly leveraged transactions, 2017 will be
remembered as the year in which unitranche nancings (such as
iNova, Laser Clinics and Novotech) and Australian law-governed
AUD-only Term Loan Bs (Camp Australia, Leap Legal/Infotrack
and Craveable Brands) really made a big impact. While traditional
senior/senior + holdco mezzanine leveraged loans continue to be
used (e.g. Icon Cancer Care), some of the larger sponsors are now
running dual-track nancing strategies, forcing banks providing
traditional syndicated loans to compete with unitranche nancings
provided by institutional lenders/debt funds.
1.2 Whataresomesignicantlendingtransactionsthat
have taken place in your jurisdiction in recent years?
Large corporate loans syndicated in the Asia-Pacic loan
markets included Sydney Airport on its A$1.4 billion
renancing – voted KangaNews’ syndicated loan deal of the
year 2017, Transurban Group’s A$1bn+ renancing and the
Port of Brisbane renancing.
The rst Australian law standalone covenant-lite AUD Term
Loan B facility for an Australian corporate, arranged by
Goldman Sachs and JPMorgan for leading tech companies
LEAP Legal Software and Infotrack and the senior and
mezzanine AUD Term Loan B facilities for the debt
recapitalisation of Craveable Brands.
Signicant acquisition nancings including Carlyle/PEP’s
iNova acquisition, QIC/Goldman Sachs PIA/Pagoda
Investment consortium’s acquisition of Icon Cancer Care and
KKR’s acquisition of Laser Clinics Australia.
KWM was involved on all the above transactions (including on the
vendor/bidder side).

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT