Learning Support Assistant Was Constructively Dismissed In Relation To Health And Safety Failings

Published date25 May 2021
Subject MatterEmployment and HR, Contract of Employment, Unfair/ Wrongful Dismissal, Health & Safety, Employee Benefits & Compensation
Law FirmWrigleys Solicitors
AuthorMs Alacoque Marvin

Lack of manual handling training in lifting disabled pupil was a fundamental breach of contract.

Duty to take reasonable care of employees' health and safety

Employers have a duty to take reasonable care of the health and safety of their employees, to take reasonable steps to provide a safe workplace and to provide a safe system of work. This duty arises from statutory obligations under the Health and Safety at Work Act 1974 and a number of health and safety regulations, the common law duty of care, and a contractual duty implied into every employment contract.

Constructive dismissal and health and safety failings

Employees can claim constructive dismissal where they resign in response to their employer's fundamental breach of contract. One of the key questions in such cases will be whether the employer's act or failure to act is serious enough to be a fundamental breach of contract. Where the employer fails to comply with its health and safety obligations, the tribunal will consider the nature of the breach. Some health and safety failings will be serious enough to be a fundamental breach entitling the employee to resign as a consequence and to bring a constructive dismissal claim.

After a fundamental breach has occurred, employees can sometimes "affirm" the contract by doing something which shows they are putting up with the situation and acting as if the contract still exists. The case law shows that this question will be very fact-specific, but affirmation can happen where an employee fails to complain about the situation and/or delays too long after the breach before resigning.

A recent case in the EAT considered whether employers can do something to "cure" a fundamental breach of contract after it has occurred but before resignation takes place.

Case details: Flatman v Essex County Council

Ms Flatman worked in a maintained school as a Learning Support Assistant. Her role was to give support to a disabled pupil and included daily weight-bearing and lifting of the pupil. Over a period of around 8 months from September 2017, Ms Flatman made repeated requests for manual handling training. Although the school managers assured her that steps would be taken to arrange this, no training was put in place. In December 2017, she developed back pain and reported this to the school.

At the beginning of May 2018, the Claimant was signed off for three weeks with back pain. The head teacher informed Ms Flatman that she would not be required to lift the pupil on her...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT