Legislature Confuses Common Law With Equity

Published date14 February 2022
Subject MatterCorporate/Commercial Law, Corporate and Company Law
Law FirmAllen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP
AuthorMr Keith P. Bishop

Though never a colony of England, California nonetheless has adopted the Common Law of England as the rule of decision in the state's courts (except when repugnant to, or inconsistent with, the Constitution of the United States, or the Constitution or laws of California). Cal. Civ. Code ' 22.2. See Ahistorical Bedfellows: The California Corporations Code And The Common Law. England also had separate courts of equity and the distinction between law and equity remains important in some contexts. For example, equitable matters are typically determined by the judge and not a jury.

The California legislature seems to have forgotten or ignored the historical differences between law and equity when it enacted the California Revised Uniform Limited Liability Company Act. Corporations Code Section 17703.04(b) begins by providing "A member of a limited liability...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT