Peerless, This is Not: Sixth Circuit Finds No Latent Ambiguity in Consent to Settle Requirement in Excess Policy

Published date06 January 2017
Law FirmCarlton Fields
AuthorHeidi Raschke
Subject MatterSettlement,Medical Devices,Excess Policies,Pfizer,National Union,Umbrella Policies,Insurance Industry,Product Defects,Denial of Insurance Coverage,Pharmaceutical Industry,Stryker

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT