Police And Bus Driver Not To Blame For Greyhound Crash

Meady v. Greyhound Canada Transportation Corp., 2015 ONCA 6

On December 23, 2000, then 21-year-old Shaun Davis boarded a Greyhound bus in northern Ontario heading east from Calgary to spend Christmas with family in Nova Scotia.

About an hour into the trip, Davis left his seat to stand in the stairwell next to the bus driver. Davis requested that the driver stop because he thought some people on the bus wanted to hurt him. Davis was told to return to his seat by the bus driver, but ignored these requests. Then Davis lunged at the driver and grabbed the steering wheel.

The bus veered off the road and toppled onto its side. One person was killed and many of the 32 passengers were injured.

The passengers sued Davis, the bus driver, Greyhound, and two police officers who had interacted with Davis before he boarded this bus. Davis had met with police at the bus stop before the accident, stating that he was worried that people were trying to hurt him.

After a 60 day trial, the trial judge dismissed the action against all defendants other than Davis.

The passengers appealed, saying that the trial judge made a mistake in excluding the evidence of two experts - the first being a specialist in police training, and the second being an expert in bus safety.

The passengers argued that the police expert would have shown that competent police officers, upon noting that Davis was delusional or agitated, would have kept him off of the bus. Meanwhile, the bus safety expert would have demonstrated that a prudent driver, upon noting Davis standing close to him and in an agitated state, would have reduced...