Retailers Beware - Recent Losses In Domain Name Decisions
Retailers and brands in the retail sector have recently been
hit with a string of losses under the Uniform Domain Name
Dispute Resolution Procedure ("UDRP"), which was
designed to offer brand owners a quick and relatively
inexpensive way of resolving domain name disputes.
In the
www.raleighbikes.com case1, Swissbikes Vertriebs
GmbH (the owner of the "RALEIGH" trade marks for
bicycles) was unsuccessful in having the name transferred to
it, as although the domain name was held to be confusingly
similar to the RALEIGH trade marks, the owner of the name was
using it for a non-commercial forum site for fans of Raleigh
bikes and therefore there was no proof that the name was
registered or was being used in bad faith.
The second case2 brought by Cosmos European
Travels AG ("Cosmos"), the operators and promoters of
travel tours, involved the domain name
www.cosmosholidays.net, which is a Chinese website
providing hotel accommodation and travel related services, with
more than 600 travel agent users in China.
Again the domain name was held to be confusingly similar to
Cosmos' trade mark for "COSMOS" and certain other
trade marks, however in this case the Panel declined to
transfer the name to Cosmos on the grounds that the name
incorporates part of the registrant's corporate name, and
Cosmos could not prove that the Chinese owner of the name had
Cosmos in mind when it started using the domain name.
This was despite Cosmos providing a decision of the US
courts stating that Cosmos had a worldwide reputation in the
Cosmos trade mark, and also despite Cosmos providing figures
showing that (i) Cosmos tours and holidays have generated
annual sales in excess of US$2.6bn and (ii) in the past 4 years
Cosmos and its licensees have spent over US$35m on advertising
and promoting the Cosmos brand.
Finally, in the case of
www.agnesbi.com3, the well known fashion
designer and retailer that sells clothing, jewellery and other
accessories and cosmetic products under the
www.agnesbi.com"Agnès b." name worldwide,
failed in having the domain name transferred to her.
Despite the domain name being held to be confusingly similar
to her "AGNES B." trade mark, Mrs Agnès B,
having failed to provide any evidence that the owner of the
domain name (a Polish individual) would be more likely than not
to know of Angès B.'s activities, could not prove
that the individual registered the domain name with knowledge
of her use of the "Agnès B." name. In
particular, the Panellist noted...
To continue reading
Request your trial