Sanctions Regulator Hardens Its Heart

• Published date: 12 May 2021
• Subject Matter: Finance and Banking, Government, Public Sector, International Law, Financial Services, Constitutional & Administrative Law, Export Controls & Trade & Investment Sanctions, Human Rights
• Law Firm: Doughty Street Chambers
• Author: Mr Peter Caldwell

The Office of Financial Sanctions Implementation (OFSI) has updated its monetary penalty guidance, coming into force next week on 1 April 2021, and replacing the previous version from 2018. Much has changed in Sanctions enforcement over the past 3 years, most notably Brexit and the adoption of the Magnitsky Act style Global Human Rights Sanctions. OFSI's re-appraisal of its role is timely, but whilst the guidance retains many familiar principles, the update reflects a marked hardening of OFSI's approach to enforcement.

OFSI states that the new guidance incorporates lessons learned through its monetary penalty cases as well as clarifying OFSI's position on certain points. The new approach appears to take the position that industry and advisors have now had ample opportunity to come up to speed with their compliance responsibilities and can therefore expect OFSI to adopt a less forgiving approach to breaches.

Case Assessment

The guidance on case assessment - the factors that may aggravate or mitigate OFSI's view of a case - removes some of the reassurance that had characterised the predecessor regime. Whereas in 2018 OFSI adopted an understanding tone to individuals who might have become confused about their UK sanctions obligations with responsibilities under other national sanctions regimes, these conciliatory comments have now been deleted. Likewise the former assurance that OFSI will not apply its jurisdiction in respect of conduct that "does not naturally come under it" is replaced by a more terse statement that in OFSI will consider "whether the potential breach comes within its authority". That change of tone underscores the new reality of the UK's autonomous Sanctions regime post-Brexit, with OFSI having a more prominent and assertive role.

Direct provision of funds

The new guidance removes the distinction between the direct provision of funds to a designated person and breaches that do not make funds or economic resources available to a designated person. Breaches by way of direct provision were formerly to be treated more seriously than generic breaches. The removal of the distinction gives OFSI a broader discretion to deal with indirect provision of funds as being a serious breach in itself.

Circumvention of Sanctions

The case factors continue to emphasise the seriousness of cases where the object or effect has been to circumvent sanctions, but the new Guidance removes reference to the formerly express default position that OFSI will normally...