Security Of Tenure In Commercial And Residential Tenancies
-
The Four Equities
A commercial or residential tenant will look to the Landlord
and Tenant (Amendment) Act 1980 (the "1980 Act") and
the Landlord and Tenant (Amendment) Act 1994 in asserting his
or her rights to renew an existing lease. These acts provide
that in order to be entitled to a new tenancy beginning on the
termination of the previous tenancy, a tenant must prove the
existence of one of the four "equities".
-
Business equity
A tenant has a business equity if he or she is in occupation
of a business premise used wholly or partly for the purpose of
carrying on a business for a continuous period of five years
immediately prior to service of notice of intention to claim
relief.
-
Long possession equity
A tenant has a long possession equity if he or she has been
in continuous occupation of business or residential premises
for a period of 20 years immediately prior to service of notice
of intention to claim relief.
-
Improvements equity
A tenant has an improvements equity if improvements have
been made on either business or residential premises of which
he or she is in occupation and not less than one-half of the
letting value of the premises at the time is attributable to
those improvements.
-
Rent acts equity
Sections 14 and 15 of the Landlord and Tenant (Amendment)
Act 1980 give certain tenants of both commercial and
residential premises, which were decontrolled by the Rent
Restriction Acts 1960-1967, rights to a new tenancy.
As can be seen, the requirements which residential tenants
must meet under the acts if they are to claim the right to
renew an existing tenancy, put them in a rather unenviable
position as compared to that enjoyed by a commercial tenant,
which must only prove five years continuous occupation.
-
Grounds for Refusal to Grant New Tenancy
The legislative provisions under which a tenant may lose
his/her entitlement to a new tenancy are more likely to impact
adversely on residential tenants. Section 17(2) of the 1980 Act
outlines the grounds on which a landlord can refuse to grant a
new tenancy to which the tenant would otherwise be entitled.
These grounds include where the landlord intends or has agreed
to pull down or reconstruct the buildings or any part of the
buildings, or where the landlord requires vacant possession for
the purpose of carrying out a scheme of development. The
relevance of these provisions to a tenant of a private house as
opposed to a tenant of a unit in a shopping centre is
obvious.
-
Housing...
To continue reading
Request your trial