Shanti Harilal Rama v. Bhagwat Harilal Rama
Jurisdiction | Fiji |
Judge | Master Ms Vandhana Lal |
Judgment Date | 15 August 2023 |
Court | High Court (Fiji) |
Date | 15 August 2023 |
Counsel | PLAINTIFF: Mr. N. Prasad [Mitchell Keil Lawyers],FIRST & SECOND DEFENDANTS: Mr. Naidu [Naidu Law] (Solicitors representing Defendants at time of the hearing),THIRD DEFENDANT: In Liquidation |
Docket Number | CIVIL ACTION NO.: HBC 56 of 2017 |
IN THE HIGH COURT OF FIJI
AT SUVA
CIVIL JURISDICTION
CIVIL ACTION NO.: HBC 56 of 2017
BETWEEN:
Shanti Harilal Rama
Plaintiff
v.
Bhagwat Harilal Rama
First Defendant
Joshika Samujh
Second Defendant
Rama & Sons Limited
Third Defendant
RULING BY:
Master Ms Vandhana Lal
DELIVERED ON: 15 August 2023
APPEARANCES/REPRESENTATION
PLAINTIFF: Mr. N. Prasad [Mitchell Keil Lawyers]
FIRST & SECOND DEFENDANTS: Mr. Naidu [Naidu Law] (Solicitors representing Defendants at time of the hearing)
THIRD DEFENDANT: In Liquidation
TO:
1. Suva High Court Civil File No. HBC 56 of 2017;
2. Mitchell Keil Lawyers, Solicitors for the Plaintiff;
3. Haniff Tuitoga, Solicitors for the First & Second Defendants.
INTERLOCUTORY RULING
Applications for Determination
1. There are two applications for determination before this court:
-
i. The Plaintiff's summon dated 10 August 2018 seeking orders as follows:
(a) The Plaintiff, Shanti Harilal Rama also known as Shanti Rama also known as Shanti Lal, be substituted with Kishore Lal Dahya also known as Kishor Lal and Arvind Kasabia both of Suva, Fiji, Company Directors, being the duly appointed executors and trustees of the Estate of Harilal Rama pursuant to Probate No. 43315;
(b) All documents filed in this action hereinbefore shall have effect in relation to the new Plaintiffs, Kishore Lal Dahya also known as Kishor Lal and Arvind Kasabia, as they had in relation to the existing Plaintiff, Shanti Harilal Rama also known as Shanti Rama also known as Shanti Lal;
(c) The new Plaintiffs, Kishore Lal Dahya also known as Kishor Lal and Arvind Kasabia, be given leave to amend the Statement of Claim dated 28 February 2017;
ii. The First and Second Defendants summons dated 17th December 2018 for striking out the claim pursuant to Order 18 Rule(1) (a) of the High Court Rules.
Plaintiff's Claim
2. The Plaintiff's claim is summarized as follows:
The Plaintiff and First Defendant were named beneficiaries under the Will of Late Hari Rama.
The Plaintiff alleges that the First Defendant or someone nominated by him forged the Plaintiff's signature to effect transfer of property on CL1994 (which was under the Plaintiff's name) to the First Defendant.
Further allegation are regarding Estate properties that is:
- The First Defendant passed resolution removing Plaintiff as a shareholder (1%) and director. Her signatures were forged.
- The First and Second Defendants wrongfully converted Plaintiff's entitlement in the Estate to their own gain.
The Plaintiff's application dated 10th August 2018
The First and Second Defendant's summon dated 17th December 2018
9. The First...
To continue reading
Request your trial