Spotlight: Property Insurance Case To Watch

• Published date: 20 January 2022
• Subject Matter: Insurance, Litigation, Mediation & Arbitration, Insurance Laws and Products, Trials & Appeals & Compensation
• Law Firm: Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith LLP
• Author: Edward Sylvester

(January 2022) - On December 21, 2021, the Florida Supreme Court accepted jurisdiction arising from State Farm Fla. Ins. Co. v. Parrish, 312 So. 3d 145, 151 (Fla. 2d DCA 2021), holding "[w]e certify conflict with Brickell, to the extent it holds that a public adjuster who has a contingency interest in an insured's appraisal award or represents an insured in an appraisal process can serve as a 'disinterested appraiser' under a policy's appraisal provision." With the court's acceptance of jurisdiction in Parrish, which is based upon the noted conflict with Brickell, and knowing that Brickell relied upon Rios v. Tri-State Insurance Company, 714 So. 2d 547 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998), it appears that the Parrish court will solidify the meaning of "disinterested," "independent" and "impartial" appraisers - and will not limit its ruling to just "disinterested" appraisers.

To the extent policy terms are undefined in a policy, the Florida Supreme Court - and the Third District Court of Appeals - have long held that undefined terms in an insurance policy "should be given its plain and ordinary meaning, and courts may look to legal and non-legal dictionary definitions to determine such a meaning." Gov't Emples. Ins. Co. v. Macedo, 228 So. 3d 1111, 1113 (Fla. 2017) (citation omitted). Undefined terms of a policy should utilize "ordinary language or 'man-on-the-street' definition." Pa. Life Ins. Co. v. Aron, 739 So. 2d 1171, 1174 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999). The "terms of the contract must be given their everyday meaning and read in light of the skill and experience of ordinary people." Lindheimer v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co., 643 So. 2d 636, 638 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994).

Rather than follow this boilerplate law, the Third District Court of Appeals - in Rios, Brickell, and others - broadened the tenets for interpreting undefined terms in an insurance contract by going beyond the plain, ordinary, man-on-the-street, dictionary understanding. Specifically, Rios and Brickell created the notion of a "more workable approach" by relying on the Code of Ethics for Arbitrators in Commercial Disputes and finding that "disclosure" by the appraiser would suffice to overcome any "independent" or "impartial" issues. The obvious problem with this approach is that simply allowing...