The Law 13,097/2015 And The Concentration Of Acts In The Property Record File

The process of acquisition of a property, as a rule, usually involves a thorough analysis of the documentation in relation to the property itself, the seller and the former owners. Such documentation, usually provided by the seller, is analyzed for the purpose of verifying the legal safety of the target business.

With the main goal of reducing fees and accelerating real estate business processes, Federal Law No. 13,097/2015 was published in the Official Gazette on January 20, 2015, which secures the effectiveness of all legal acts intended to form, transfer or change in rem rights over real estate in relation to previous acts that were not registered or annotated in the record file of the property. Thus, such previous acts not registered or annotated in the record file of the property could not be opposed against by third-party purchasers.

Popularly called "Law of Concentration of Acts in the Property's Record File", the Federal Law N. 13,097/2015, among other provisions, aims to protect the rights of the non-inert creditor, as well as of the bona fides purchaser, who, based on such Law, would not need to demonstrate its due diligence in the business by the issuance and analysis of the innumerous certificates usually required for such purpose, like the certificates issued by Court distributors, for example.

The Law of Concentration of Acts in the Property's Record File conferred a term of two years, counting from the beginning of its effectiveness, for the registries and annotations related to legal acts dated prior to the Law to be carried out, and said term ended on February 20, 2017.

Ideally, a greater dynamism is expected with regard to real estate acquisitions and, consequently, a reduction in the average time spent on the conclusion of the respective procedures. Although we can consider the Law of Concentration of Acts in the Property's Record File innovative, the subject still has been timidly approached by the Judiciary. In the meantime, we may be sure of one thing: while the consolidation of the Judiciary's interpretation about the application, extension and effectiveness of...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT