Top Court Provides Guidance On Advance Costs Awards For Indigenous Rights Litigation

• Published date: 06 April 2022
• Subject Matter: Government, Public Sector, Litigation, Mediation & Arbitration, Trials & Appeals & Compensation, Indigenous Peoples
• Law Firm: MLT Aikins LLP
• Author: Mr Drew Lafond, Meaghan Conroy and Jianna Rieder

First Nations - not the Courts or the Crown - are best positioned to determine the pressing needs of their communities, according to a recent Supreme Court of Canada decision that offers hope to First Nations fighting to enforce their Treaty rights in court.

On March 18, 2022, the Supreme Court of Canada released its decision in Anderson v Alberta, 2022 SCC 6. This decision has important implications for First Nations seeking advance costs from the Crown to fund public interest litigation, including litigation to enforce Treaty rights.

Background

In 2008, Beaver Lake Cree Nation filed a claim alleging the federal and provincial Crown had infringed its Treaty rights by improperly allowing so much land to be taken up for industrial and resource development. A decade into the legal fight, and after spending over $3 million in legal fees, Beaver Lake Cree Nation said that it could no longer afford to pursue litigation. At that point, the trial was scheduled to begin in January 2024.

In order to be able to proceed with its Treaty infringement claim, Beaver Lake Cree Nation filed an application for advance costs in the amount of $5 million. The purpose of an order for advance costs is to provide the recipient with the funds necessary to help finance the litigation. Previously, the Supreme Court of Canada had set out a three-part test for a First Nation to meet before a court can consider making an order for advance costs:

1. the First Nation must "genuinely" be unable to pay for the litigation (the "impecuniosity requirement");
2. the claim must be meritorious on its face; and,
3. the claim must raise issues that are of public importance and novel.

For Beaver Lake Cree Nation...